Alien abduction
by Travis Walton (reconstitution). This image is in the Public Domain.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Walton(reconstitution).png
Did you know that long-time Monty Python fan and former member of The Beatles, George Harrison mortgaged his quite expensive house to fund the production of the movie, Life of Brian? If you did, you might have what it takes to win some counter-propaganda efforts, since I just learned this from a vintage documentary. You had the advantage to be first (probably way before me, anyway).
Continuing the theme, of all people, Woody Allen not just humorously alerted us to the important quality of being first. He pointed out that the world should not be so preoccupied with any invaders from outer space having a technology that's many years ahead of ours. He claimed it was not advanced technologies supported by plans for world domination that will win. He worried about the invading force that was equipped to be anywhere even fifteen minutes ahead of us.
It's the same with propaganda. Being first wins, especially followed up with high repetition.
Which is why the bad actor, and just about any savvy politician, likes to give her or his version of bad news first, or at least be quickest to reframe the story after the breaking news. Of course, a bad actor who has lots of bad news sometimes has to take a little longer to weigh up which bad news has enough traction to need response. This delay gives quick-off-the mark counter-propaganda the opportunity for added advantage.
Which is also why breakfast brainstorming sessions to counter anticipated propaganda was so often the advantage that won airtime during my brushes with politics.
Because being first applies to counter-propaganda too. Enough with all the micro-analyses. Just get ahead of the game–fifteen minutes ahead, at least. Which is why those media people who have long-winded, polite interviews about or with crooks will never really succeed in keeping them accountable. Some media interviewers are very effective at walking bad actors into disclosing themselves. But, you don't need nuanced understanding of someone picking your pocket; you need to stop them.
If you feel this might not be democratic, I'd counter that you're reasserting simple dialogue–which is kryptonite to propaganda with its sole purpose of mindless obedience, as well as to the bad actor behind it.
No time now to be writing instruction books and action plans either. Just counter-propaganda ahead of the continuous stream of drivel is what matters now.
1 comment:
A propagandist that is nearly ALWAYS quicker on the uptake and much, much more named and known is what matters most with most voters.
The news media do us all a HUGE dis-service by covering him perpetually - IGNORE and disinfect is best, not endless commenting on him. I agree with your earlier comment about the uselessness and danger of disseminating him more with their useless wide broadcast of him by "fact-checking" - he trades on the media's insatiable need for BS to keep ratings up and fill the "news" with HIM.
The best counter-propaganda in 2018, and probably now, would be health care benefits and costs ONLY and ALL THE TIME - every variant under the sun until Nov 3.
Anyone likely to change a vote at this stage is motivated totally by self-interest and filters out bombshells, doesn't believe the Russian stories, doesn't care about corruption or believes the stories are politically slanted... Hmmmm - 🤔
Post a Comment